Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is much better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), with an 84.3 score against 74.9. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a a lot newer and a lot thinner phone than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it's somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much bigger screen, a much higher 2224 x 2488px resolution and a little bit greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy A9 (2016) has an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a way higher video definition, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features improved battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.