Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-05-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a overall score of 80.6 against 74.9. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a a lot newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), but it is notably thicker and just a little heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little larger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A9 (2016) has slightly more storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has a way more MP camera. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 32 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.