Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a score of 87.9 against 74.9. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), it's thicker and just a little heavier. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite larger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little greater pixels count per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.