Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F3 is much better than Galaxy A9 (2016), with a general score of 87.3 against 74.9. The Xiaomi Poco F3 is a a lot newer and a bit lighter device than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is just a little thicker. The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a just a bit greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a little bit bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F3 captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments and a much better resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco F3 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4520mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.