Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting an 81.6 score against 74.9. Even though the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), it is much thicker and a little heavier. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite larger display and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a camera with way more megapixels.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.