Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), having an 82.2 score against 74.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 body is just a little lighter but somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a way better 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bigger display and a greater pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A9 (2016) features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, although it has a smaller aperture and a camera in the back with a much lower 13 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.