Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s overall score of 74.9. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's design is somewhat thicker and a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a better pixel count per screen inch, a bit bigger screen and a much higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features greater battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.