Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a score of 77.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s overall score of 74.9. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016).
Galaxy A9 (2016) has a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much better resolution of 2080 x 2400px, a little bigger screen and a greater display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.