Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a overall score of 81.1 against 74.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and a bit heavier than the Galaxy A9 (2016). Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bit larger display, a just a bit higher display density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a camera with lot more MP. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.