Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has an overall score of 83, which is better than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 global score. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is thicker than Galaxy A9 (2016), it's a bit lighter and also a lot newer. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit better pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.