Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2022-09-19 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Space Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate's 83.2 overall score. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s body is extremely thinner and way lighter than the Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2448 pixels, a little larger display and a just a bit greater pixel amount in each screen inch.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much more powerful CPU than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 58% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.