Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-03-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.90 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, having a general score of 85.2 against 76.1. Even though Galaxy A9 (2018) is a lot older than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, it's design is thinner and lighter. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a lot better hardware performance than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little inferior pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 45 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.