Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than Honor 50 Pro, having an 85.2 score against 77. The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a little lighter phone than Honor 50 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Honor 50 Pro has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit higher pixel number per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1236 x 2676 resolution and a little larger display.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Honor 50 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Honor 50 Pro features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 50 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.