Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Titan gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s score of 85.2. LG K92's design is newer than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s, although it is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) and the LG K92 both feature very similar screens, although the LG K92 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite bigger display and a quite higher pixels density.
The LG K92 features a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit better processing unit than LG K92. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
LG K92 features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5% greater battery size. LG K92 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG K92 also counts with a way bigger sensor and a much better 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.