Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Holographic white |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than the LG Stylo 6, getting an 85.2 score against 76.7. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG Stylo 6, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more more than a year before. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit greater pixel count per inch of screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a quite bigger display.
The LG Stylo 6 has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6's processor is very similar to the Galaxy A9 (2018) one, and although the LG Stylo 6 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG Stylo 6 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3800mAh. The Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations, a back camera with lot more megapixels, a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.