Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Glass and Metal | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.76 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is a bit better than LG V10, with a general score of 85.2 against 78.6. Galaxy A9 (2018) is a noticeably newer device, and it's also just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than LG V10. LG V10 features a better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
LG V10 has slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a superior processor than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
LG V10 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a much less mega-pixels back camera, a worse video quality and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with longer battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 27 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.