Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), getting a overall score of 87.6 against 85.2. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), it's thicker and heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit greater pixels density, a bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32% larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, a much tinier sensor giving a way worse image quality and a much lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.