Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is slightly better than Galaxy A9 (2018), having a 91.2 score against 85.2. LG Wing's body is newer than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s, but it's noticeably thicker and extremely heavier. The LG Wing counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Wing counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit better pixel density, a little larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution. LG Wing counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG Wing features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh. The LG Wing counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Wing also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.