Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a general score of 85.2 against 78.5. Even being the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a much older, a bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit better pixels amount per display inch, a little bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much more mega-pixels camera and a lot higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.