Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | -- |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Interstellar Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s global score of 78.9. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a little bit lower pixels density, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a quite smaller display. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more MP camera in the back. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.