Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is slightly better than Motorola One 5G Ace's global score of 81.6. Although the Galaxy A9 (2018) is notably older than Motorola One 5G Ace, it's design is somewhat lighter and notably thinner. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a display that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) one, although the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a just a bit greater screen pixels density, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola One 5G Ace has longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola One 5G Ace features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.