Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body is thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola One Hyper, although it was released about a year before. Motorola One Hyper features a screen that is very similar to the display in Galaxy A9 (2018), although the Motorola One Hyper also has a little larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit greater pixels density.
The Motorola One Hyper has a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has more RAM.
Motorola One Hyper captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back. The Motorola One Hyper counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.