Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2018-11-15 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Blue and Brown |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) design is just a little bit heavier but a little bit thinner than Motorola One Vision, and they were released only a couple of months apart.
Motorola One Vision features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola One Vision also has a just a little more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px. Motorola One Vision's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as the Galaxy A9 (2018) one, both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and equal internal memory.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features a little faster CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Motorola One Vision takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.