Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018), having a overall score of 87 against 85.2. The Motorola razr (2020) construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A9 (2018), but it is just a little heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2220, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite larger display. Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 36% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.