Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's global score of 77.7. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Galaxy A9 (2018)'s construction is older, just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bigger screen, a little better screen pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a lot bigger sensor and a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.