Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | -- |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with an 85.2 score against 77. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a little heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a bit better pixels amount in each inch of screen, a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a slightly better storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a really longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.