Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018), having a 93.4 score against 85.2. The Galaxy S22 is a a lot newer phone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A9 (2018). Galaxy S22 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A9 (2018) features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 3% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.