Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 general score. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is extremely newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a greater pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.