Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018), having an 88.5 score against 85.2. The Galaxy Z Flip body weights the same than Galaxy A9 (2018), but it's a little thinner. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a little bit greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a little bit more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A9 (2018) captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also counts with a lot more MP camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.