Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 (2018)'s score of 85.2. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and somewhat thinner device than Galaxy A9 (2018), although it is noticeably heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a bigger screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2's camera is very similar to Galaxy A9 (2018)'s camera, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.