Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-15 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's general score of 82.7. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s construction is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, although it was released just 9 months before. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a slightly better display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a just a little better pixels number per inch in the display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite bigger screen.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way more megapixels camera.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.