Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, having an 85.2 score against 84.3. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body is somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, but it is incredibly thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little higher number of pixels in each display inch, a bigger display and a lot better resolution of 2224 x 2488. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a much more MP camera, a way larger back camera sensor and a way higher video resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features improved battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 34% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.