Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with a global score of 85.2 against 82.4. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A9 (2018) is much older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, it's design is just a little thinner and just a little lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A9 (2018). Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit greater pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 64 GB more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.