Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a general score of 85.2 against 78.2. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s design is a bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it's a bit heavier and was released 3 years before. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little greater pixels number in each display inch, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger screen. The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32% larger battery size. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.