Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-11-15 | -- |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s 85.2 general score. Even being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's design is heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy A9 (2018). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a much higher 2080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit higher screen pixel density and a bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot higher 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.