Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, having an 85.2 score against 75.7. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, but it is a bit lighter. Galaxy A9 (2018) features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite bigger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little better pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features greater battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.