Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2018-11-15 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 392 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit higher screen pixel density.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.