Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-11-15 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 392 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 general score. Although Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro were released with only 0 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) body is a little bit thinner but also a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch of display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a much better video quality and a camera with a lot better 24 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.