Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's construction is extremely newer than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, although it's just a little heavier and a bit thicker.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a superior performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a better resolution of 1242 x 2688px, a little larger display and a little bit better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 256 GB. IPhone 11 Pro Max shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with better battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.