Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 has a score of 88.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. The iPhone 12 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. IPhone 12 is a newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The iPhone 12 has a better CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 12 also counts with a 64 bits processor. The Apple iPhone 12 features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a just a bit better display pixels density, a better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features more memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 12, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. IPhone 12 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back-facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone 12, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.