Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is way better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s score of 74.4. The iPhone 12 Pro is a way newer phone, and it is also lighter and a little thinner than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). The iPhone 12 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little larger screen, a higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a just a bit better amount of pixels per inch of screen. IPhone 12 Pro features a superior processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a greater amount of RAM.
IPhone 12 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a way less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments. IPhone 12 Pro has a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.