Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. The iPhone 12 Pro Max design is extremely newer and a little thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). IPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
IPhone 12 Pro Max features a way better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite bigger display, a quite higher pixels count per inch in the screen and a better 1284 x 2778 resolution. IPhone 12 Pro Max has a superior performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has longer battery life than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3687mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.