Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a 91.5 score against 74.4. The iPhone 13 is a way newer cellphone, and it's also just a little thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). IPhone 13 has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The iPhone 13 counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little larger screen, a little bit better display pixel density and a better 1170 x 2532 resolution. The iPhone 13 has a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone 13 counts with more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The iPhone 13 captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lot worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a superior battery life than iPhone 13, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.