Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a global score of 93.3 against 74.4. The iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro is a way newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a higher 1170 x 2532px resolution, a bit larger display and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a really superior performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a superior battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 62% larger battery capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.