Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is a lot better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a general score of 93.2 against 74.4. IPhone 13 Pro Max's design is incredibly newer and just a little thinner than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, although it is somewhat heavier. IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit bigger screen. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much powerful processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit processor. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a way less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a bit better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.