Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro has a score of 95.6, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s overall score of 74.4. The iPhone 14 Pro body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it is just a little lighter. IPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 14 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a greater pixels quantity per display inch, a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 1179 x 2556px. IPhone 14 Pro counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has lesser CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments. The iPhone 14 Pro counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much longer battery duration than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.