Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 9.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s is better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a overall score of 83 against 74.4. Apple iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. Apple iPhone 6s is a extremely lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although they were released only 7 months apart.
IPhone 6s features a brighter screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a lot smaller display, a just a little worse screen pixels density and a way worse resolution of 1334 x 750 pixels. The Apple iPhone 6s features a better performing processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics processor.
IPhone 6s has more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The iPhone 6s takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera, a tinier sensor taking worse quality pictures and videos and a smaller diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 6s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 1715mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.