Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2020) is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting an 81.5 score against 74.4. The iPhone SE (2020) has iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. IPhone SE (2020)'s design is way newer, much lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
IPhone SE (2020) features a quite better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone SE (2020) has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a lot smaller display, a little worse amount of pixels per inch of screen and a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334px.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a better memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 175 percent larger battery size.
The iPhone SE (2020) takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.