Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a score of 88.1 against 74.4. Apple iPhone X's construction is newer, a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). IPhone X counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The iPhone X features a superior CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has 2 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone X features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The iPhone X has a very superior camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photographs, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.