Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having an 82 score against 74.4. The Apple iPhone XR construction is much newer and just a bit lighter, but also a little thicker than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). IPhone XR has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XR, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB. The iPhone XR counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. IPhone XR takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.